Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05
  • br The coefficient of resistance to

    2018-10-23


    The coefficient of resistance to humidity (Crh) is defined with respect to the resistance to crushing after five cycles of alternate watering and drying and the resistance to the simple order Tariquidar when dried. Crh: Coefficient of resistance to humidity, σmsa: The resistance to humid compression (resistance after immersion at the fifth cycle). σsec: The resistance to the compression at drying (resistance after steaming at the first cycle). Fsec: The maximal charge of breaking-up after steaming at the first cycle. Fmsa: The maximal charge of breaking-up after immersion at the fifth cycle. The observed data are included in the following below Chart 2. The chart provides the following information:
    Acknowledgments
    Specifications Table
    Value of the data
    Data Data contained in this brief (spreadsheets in Supplementary data) was used to support the development of experiments that conducted by Liu et al. [1]. Vehicular crashes located inside of or near intersection are counted and categorized by crash severity levels. The data involves all recorded crashes happened in a seven-year period from year 2004 to 2010 within the city of Chicago׳s jurisdiction. In addition, the top 200 intersections are listed in the shared data according to crash frequency and crash severity levels.
    Experimental design, materials and methods
    Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the Chicago and Illinois transportation agencies for facilitating data collection and processing. The work described in this article was partially supported by grants from the Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province (Project no.: 2015BHE004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Project no.: 51479156).
    1. Data The equivalent thermal conductivity represents the heat flow within the cavities. It is influenced by the geometry and the material. For the ten frame sections reported in the UNI, the equivalent thermal conductivity has been evaluated (File 1). CFD simulation results, in particular temperature and velocity in the cavities, are reported (File 2).
    Experimental design, materials and methods The calculation procedure based on the CFD approach has been performed by the followed steps: The details of adopted methodology are presented in [1]. File 2 shows the isolines for the temperature, the velocity magnitude and the velocity vectors within the frame sections in two different cases: air solid and air gas into the cavities.
    Data The six figures present patterns of change among 12 lower extremity variables collected in a single-leg landing task following external load and landing height manipulations. Ensemble time series plots and principal component analysis (PCA) results are shown for each variable. Principal component (PC) loading vectors and PC scores present magnitude and temporal changes among conditions, along with analysis of variance results (ANOVA, p<0.05).
    Experimental design, materials and methods We analyzed 19 healthy volunteers (15M, 4F, age: 24.3±4.9 y, mass: 78.5±14.7kg, height: 1.73±0.08m) during 9 single-leg drop landing trials in each of six experimental conditions. External load and landing height were adjusted as percentages of subject-specific anthropometrics (bodyweight: BW, and subject height: H). We applied external loads to the trunk with small backpacks and iron weights. Landing height was manipulated with an adjustable platform. Conditions were: 1.) BW•H12.5, 2.) BW+12.5•H12.5, 3.) BW+25•H12.5, 4.) BW•H25, 5.) BW+12.5•H25, 6.) BW+25•H25, completed in randomized order. Subjects completed single leg landing trials on their preferred limb. We collected 12 lower extremity variables: sagittal joint angles and moments (hip, knee, and ankle), vertical ground reaction force (GRFz), and electrical muscle activities (gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, vastus medialis, medial gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles). Kinematic data were collected with 10-camera system (16-point spatial model; Vicon Plugin-Gait; MX-T40S; 200Hz), kinetic data were collected with a force platform (Kistler Type 9281CA; 2000Hz), and electromyographic (EMG) data were collected with passive dual surface electrodes (Ag/AgCl; Noraxon Myosystem 2000; 2000Hz).